For those that did not know, it was Mitt Romney and his top advisor Jonathan Gruber who were the ones responsible for the unconstitutional RomneyCare, which you know now to be the blueprint for ObamaCare (Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution).
MIT professor Jonathan Gruber, who advised both Romney and President Obama on their health care reform plans, told the Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin that without Romney’s plan, and more specifically, that plan’s individual mandate, President Obama never could have gotten his plan through Congress:
He says that as the federal health care plan emerged, the Massachusetts plan was “widely discussed.” […]
In his opinion, without the Massachusetts plan, the federal individual mandate plan wouldn’t have garnered acceptance and gotten through. “It was huge,” Gruber says, to have the Massachusetts plan to point to. And without it, he thinks “it’s likely” ObamaCare wouldn’t have become law.
While the attempt to further divide and conquer continues by adding more confusion (Daniel 9:8), Harry Reid from has now demanded that Paul Ryan denounce his support for Trump, who is said to be in support of the KKK because David Duke supports Trump. How does that work?
Furthermore, America, we have one Constitution, not two! We are ruled by Law, not party.
“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” –President John Adams
Also, remember that every single one of these players is an outlaw when it comes to the enumerated laws of our Constitutional Republic. Every single one of them!
Why are the American people confused?
President James Garfield quickly brought this to resolve when he said,
“Now more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless, and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption.”
Why aren’t these (effeminate thugs) representatives calling for the indictment of Bill and Hillary Clinton? It is not like they have to speculate when it comes to the list of crimes committed against the American people when it comes to the Clintons.
Why are they not bringing this to light (Ephesians 5:11)?
What of the Travelgate scandal? Whitewater scandal? Filegate scandal? Lootergate scandal? Drug Dealer Donor scandal? Ponzi scheme and political favor scandal? Benghazi? The email scandal? Mena, Arkansas drug trafficking scandal? What of the dead bodies strewn across the path of the Clintons (147) and the list goes on and on concerning who Hillary is and what she is truly about.
Why are they not calling her out America? To call out Hilary for these would be the same as exposing themselves in so many different ways. Just look at their records. They are just as guilty as she is, and that is exactly why they are attempting to protect her.
America, it stands true, these are protecting themselves against those who are raising some serious threats to the ground (the establishment) that they mean to hold. It is vital that these usher Hilary in so that things remain the same.
We were warned by George Mason in Article 3 of Virginia’s Declaration of Rights:
That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.